avin_mehya

Yes client certificate is needed and the same has been installed in browser

Hi, While verifying scripts for one of our websites we are receiving X509 certificate is required error. We had few scripts which were recorded two months back and above error appears when verifying them. Moreover when we try to record new scripts then we are getting below error. This website works fine on browser.

Thanks a lot Sergei. Overwriting option works fine. But there are a lot of requests with similar request headers. So can this be set globally in the Default HTTP Headers at Profile level. Because there i dont see a dropdown of Overwrite.

Hi, We have a situation here where the request headers are identical barring just one difference with respect to content type. In the recorded request this happens to be application/json while during test the charset gets appended to the content-type. Response is returning an 500 Internal Server error as the method is throwing Null Pointer exception. This request with charset was posted through browser as well and it failed. I tried to add a request header with the below values so it would overwrite the automatically generated header. But that returns with content-type. Is there a way where we can send this request by isolating the charset part from the content-type. Recorded Request content-type: application/json Test Request content-type: application/json; charset=UTF-8

While recording a profile using "Website in Firefox browser" mode i am getting error stating "Cannot start recording. Error: the handle is invalid. [0x80070006]" While profiles get recorded on other browsers. Unsure as to what could be the reason.

I understood the difference...Its the same...But the unit was changed from seconds to milliseconds. I observed that now and hence the aggressive run.

In WAPT Pro 4.7, a part of Profile property was "User Think Time" while in WAPT Pro 5.0 the property is clubbed under Intra-session load volume options "Think time after page load". Are these two options same or is there a difference in their functioning? Because as i can understand the current option which is "Think time after page load" seems to be a more aggressive option while running bench-marking tests. We can always exercise the option to run tests with the time specified in page properties but they seem to be too slow. What kind of option can be used to get a common ground with the real world simulation?

I will elaborate a little bit more on our requirement. We have a page which displays different charts about activity across locations etc. There is a drop down for Currency and upon changing the same the charts get changed. The interim request calls during such a change are of Web sockets only. We need to get response time of such requests between the send and receive of web sockets.

Hi, We have an application which uses web sockets. I have recorded a profile using the web socket extension and upon execution i can see both the Send/Receive requests. My question is that is there a way to record response times of the same? Because upon checking the HTML generated reported there isnt any mention on timings of those web socket requests?

We are trying to achieve this using a Batch file. This batch file has been called inside WAPT using Javascript. Issue here is that the Batch file individually runs fine. Also the same runs perfectly fine inside the browser console. But when we run this through WAPT, this fails. Is there some step which we are missing? We have IE11 on WAPT machine and i presume that WAPT uses the same. Below is the Javascript code var myObject = new ActiveXObject("WScript.Shell"); var result = myObject.Run("D:\\welcome.bat"); log.message("Batch File executed successfully"); Welcome.bat file contains code to place files to a remote server.

This solution has worked. Thanks.

I have tried enabling plugin as well as reinstalled it a few times. Still i am facing this issue.

I am also facing a similar issue wherein Firefox plugin doesn't get installed. We are using WAPT Pro 4.3 and Firefox version is 52.0.1

Hi Team, We have been performing performance testing of our application UI using WAPT 4.3 We have few scenarios which involve a two part process: - First part involves FTP of a file - Second part takes place from UI where we process the file which was FTPed in first step Second step can be achieved using WAPT We wanted to understand by any chance can we also work upon the first step using WAPT. Thanks in advance.

Hi, Is it possible to customize the standard HTML reports? There is a lot of data which appears in the HTML reports which includes Summary Report, Performance Data etc. As per my understanding these reports are created on the basis of xsl defined in the WAPT Installation Path (\ReportTemplates) The current format is fine and the same includes enough data but we would want to make certain modifications as per our standard report. Few of the modifications which we would want to do are: -> Errors in all the profiles should be integrated as per the report. Currently these are as per profiles. Also in addition it should include the error code as well. For Example: Network Error can be a 10054 or 10061. -> We also want to include some Custom Graphs and rather than keeping graphs separately we wish to project them along with the data.