Jump to content


Critical bug in the bandwidth graph


  • Please log in to reply
2 replies to this topic

#1 Guest_Bruno_*

Guest_Bruno_*
  • Guests

Posted 05 September 2010 - 09:26 PM

Hi,

it seems WAPT Pro has a critical bug in the summary graphs.

I run some tests and I got a very confusing result. In the bandwidth tab, I see the metric "Sent per user, kbit/s" with a higher value than the metric "Sent, kbit/s".
I was not expecting this, since the number of kbits/s sent per user should be higher than the total number of kbit/s sent during my stress test.

Does anyone know if this is really a bug? What else could be? When will Softlogica fix it?

Best regards,
Bruno.

PS: I attached the graph so everybody can see the problem. I have something around 50000 kbit/s per user (almost 50Mbps), and only 2000 kbit/s. It does not make any sense to me.

Attached Files

  • Attached File  bug.png   13.86KB   7 downloads


#2 Sergei Leonov

Sergei Leonov

    Advanced Member

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPip
  • 661 posts

Posted 06 September 2010 - 08:28 AM

Please, send your results (a file with .wpr extension) to support@loadtestingtool.com.
Sergei Leonov
WAPT Project Manager
SoftLogica LLC

Office: +7-383-335-6692
Toll-free: 1-888-364-6797 (for US only)
Time zone GMT +6, EST +11
E-mail: support@loadtestingtool.com
http://www.loadtestingtool.com

#3 Sergei Leonov

Sergei Leonov

    Advanced Member

  • Administrators
  • PipPipPip
  • 661 posts

Posted 08 September 2010 - 07:26 AM

There are no bugs. Each user sends a request or receives a response very quickly. Therefore per user bandwidth usage is high. But an overall WAPT bandwidth usage is low because you set a long user think time. Your virtual users perform quick actions and then wait a long time.
Sergei Leonov
WAPT Project Manager
SoftLogica LLC

Office: +7-383-335-6692
Toll-free: 1-888-364-6797 (for US only)
Time zone GMT +6, EST +11
E-mail: support@loadtestingtool.com
http://www.loadtestingtool.com




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users